...
Items covered in this article
- Workshop Overview
- Key features
- Peer assessment
- Self-assessment
- Workshop Phases
- Setup phase
- Submission phase
- Assessment phase
- Grading evaluation phase
- Closed
- Workshop Grading
- Grade for submission
- Grade for assessment (grading grade)
- Groups and Workshop
- Workshop Grading Strategies
- Accumulative grading
- Comments
- Number of errors
- Rubric
...
During the grading evaluation phase, the Workshop grades report provides you with a comprehensive overview of all individual grades. The report uses various symbols and syntax:
| Value | Meaning |
|---|---|
| - (-) < Alice | There is an assessment allocated to be done by Alice, but it has been neither assessed nor evaluated yet |
| 68 (-) < Alice | Alice assessed the submission, giving the grade for submission 68. The grade for assessment (grading grade) has not been evaluated yet. |
| 23 (-) > Bob | Bob's submission was assessed by a peer, receiving the grade for submission 23. The grade for this assessment has not been evaluated yet. |
| 76 (12) < Cindy | Cindy assessed the submission, giving the grade 76. The grade for this assessment has been evaluated 12. |
| 67 (8) @ 4 < David | David assessed the submission, giving the grade for submission 67, receiving the grade for this assessment 8. His assessment has weight 4 |
| 80 ( | Eve's submission was assessed by a peer. Eve's submission received 80 and the grade for this assessment was calculated to 20. Teacher has overridden the grading grade to 17, probably with an explanation for the reviewer. |
Grade for submission
The final grade for every submission is based on the grades given by all reviewers of this submission. More specifically, it's calculated as a weighted mean of these assessments.
...